Legal Opinion

Meikle v. Watson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2003No. 27408PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Justice.

Torry Watson asks the Court to reverse the district court’s order for summary judgment in favor of Robert, Rex, and Vernita B. Meikle, denying Watson’s request for specific performance of a land sale contract. The decision of the district court is affirmed.

I

BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

The property in controversy is approximately 27 acres of land in Bonneville County. On March 14, 1986, Rex and Vernita Meikle purchased 5 acres of the 27, known as the southern tracts, from Earnest Hackman. Robert Meikle, Rex and Vernita’s son, purchased the remaining 22 acres from Grace…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Friel v. Boise City Housing AuthorityIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Badell v. BeeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Thomson v. Idaho Insurance Agency, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Vreeken v. Lockwood Engineering, B.V.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Cox v. MulliganIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Milus v. Sun Valley CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Thomas R. Gold v. Lockwood EngineeringIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API