Legal Opinion
Rawlings v. Layne & Bowler Pump Company
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1970No. 10569PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALDSON, Justice.
On March 6, 1967, Frank N. Rawlings (plaintiff-appellant) and the Layne & Bowler Pump Co. (defendant-respondent) entered into a written contract whereby Frank N. Rawlings agreed to buy and Layne & Bowler Pump Co. agreed to sell certain irrigation pumping machinery for a total price of $7,289.15. According to the provisions of the contract, Layne & Bowler Pump Co., the seller, was to install the irrigation pumps on Rawlings’ land. Paragraph 10 of the contract further provided that:
“Seller or Holder shall not be liable for consequential damage particularly including loss or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jack v. FillmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- H. J. Wood Co. v. JevonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Commercial Credit Equipment Corp. v. KnowltonIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- United States ex rel. Administrator of Federal Housing Administration v. Troyparisian, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Perkins v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Farmer's Insurance Company of Idaho v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Anderson & Nafziger v. G. T. Newcomb, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- McClure Engineering Associates, Inc. v. Reuben H. Donnelley Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Straley v. Idaho Nuclear CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.