Legal Opinion
Porous Media Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pall Corporation, Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1999No. 97-4390, 98-1021PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.
Porous Media Corporation and Pall Corporation, competing manufacturers of filters used in medical and other industries, appeal from a $1.6 million Lanham Act 1 judgment in favor of Porous, entered by the district court 2 pursuant to a jury verdict. Both parties also appeal several related orders of the district court. These include the court’s granting of Pali’s motion to set aside a $120,000 libel verdict for Porous; the court’s entry of judgment for Porous in regard to Pall’s false advertising counterclaim under the Lanham Act — a counterclaim rejected by the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rosenblatt v. BaerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. FalwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Fashion Boutique of Short Hills, Inc. v. Fendi Usa, Inc., and Fendi Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Proctor & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Linda Grubbs v. Sheakley Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Aviva Sports, Inc. v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.