McDonald v. Stonebraker
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
Plaintiff, W. J. McDonald, a real estate broker, sued defendants, Leo and Marjorie Stonebraker, to recover his commission of $12,500 pursuant to an exclusive listing agreement for the sale of defendants’ farm. Defendants, appealing from the judgment for plaintiff and from the order denying their post-trial motion for a new trial, contend that the trial court erred in three respects:(1) That the court’s conclusions of law do not follow from its findings of fact because, although the listing agreement conditioned plaintiff’s broker’s commission upon a sale of the property, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- LaSalle Cartage Co. v. Johnson Bros. Wholesale Liquor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Sherwood v. RosensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Schramsky v. HollmichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Edmundson v. PhenixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Rothmeier v. Investment Advisers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Metag v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- LOL Finance Co. v. Romain Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Richardson v. AfdahlSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.