Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Eimco Corp. & Deering, Milliken & Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 10, 1957PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
Pursuant to section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act, Deering, Milliken & Co. Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “ Deering”) served a notice of intention to conduct an arbitration upon the Eimco Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Eimco ”) with respect to controversies arising out of four contracts whereby Eimco agreed to purchase Saran filter fabric from Peering. Peering claims that Eimco has refused to pay invoices issued, pursuant to the contracts, for deliveries of merchandise accepted by Eimco, who has asserted certain counterclaims against Peering arising out of alleged breach of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- In re the Arbitration between Helen Whiting, Inc. & Trojan Textile Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of Tanenbaum Textile Co. v. SchlangerNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Union Oil Co. of Calif. v. LullOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Texaco, Inc. v. GoldsteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1962
- Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Rushmore InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Gera Fabrics Division, Peter Fuller Enterprises, Inc. v. Liberty Fabrics of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Bel-Rose Fashions, Inc. v. BraunheimNew York Supreme Court · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.