Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1954PublishedCited by 100 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
The question is whether the contract entered into between these parties contains an arbitration clause, precluding resort to actions at law or in equity. Westchester County Special Term denied a stay of arbitration. This order was reversed by the Appellate Division, Second Department, which unanimously granted the application for a stay (281 App. Div. 831), in reliance on Matter of Level Export Corp. (Wolz, Aiken & Co.) (280 App. Div; 211), but following reversal of the Level case in the Court of Appeals (305 N. Y. 82), a reargument was granted. Upon reargument, the Special Term order was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In Re the Arbitration Between Level Export Corp. & Wolz, Aiken & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1953
- In re General Silk Importing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. DeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
- In re General Silk Importing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- In re the Arbitration between the Acting Superintendent of Schools of Liverpool Central School District v. United Liverpool Faculty Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- In re the Arbitration between Marlene Industries Corp. & Carnac Textiles, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- In re the Arbitration between Waldron & GoddessNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Windsor Mills, Inc. v. Collins & Aikman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.