Legal Opinion
Matter of Kramer Uchitelle, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 29, 1942PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRippey, J.
Although the foregoing were separately instituted and separately prosecuted proceedings under article 84 of the Civil Practice Act, argument thereof was consolidated in the court below and in this court, the same questions are involved in all of them and they will be treated as one consolidated proceeding in our opinion here.
On June 18 and 19, 1941, the petitioner-respondent, Kramer & Uchitelle, Inc., entered into four separate written contracts severally with appellants, Eddington Fabrics Corporation, M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., and Classic Mills, Inc., affiliated corporations, generally…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Mawhinney v. Millbrook Woolen Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Nitro Powder Co. v. Agency of Canadian Car & Foundry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Varagnolo v. Partola Manufacturing CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
3Cited by87 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Harrisons & Crosfield, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.