Legal Opinion

Frank B. Hall & Co. v. Rushmore Insurance

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 20, 1981No. 80 Civ. 4976 (RLC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

Defendant Rushmore Insurance Co., Ltd. (“Rushmore”) moves to dismiss the complaint brought by plaintiff Frank B. Hall & Co. Inc. (“Hall”). Defendant is a Bermuda Insurance Company that sought to enroll sports teams in an insurance scheme whereby the teams would insure with a domestic insurer and the domestic company would reinsure with defendant. If the teams became defendant shareholders, profits realized as a result of the teams’ good loss experience could be repaid to the teams as dividends to shareholders. Plaintiff had been servicing the insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Istituto Per Lo Sviluppo Economico Dell' Italia Meridionale v. Sperti Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  2. Gimbel Bros. v. SwiftCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  3. In re the Arbitration between Eimco Corp. & Deering, Milliken & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Meridian Trading Corp. v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rinsky v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. Cook v. Nationwide InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  3. National Bank of Kuwait, S.A.K.P., New York Branch v. ParkerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
  4. Rinsky v. Cushman & Wakefield, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API