Bel-Rose Fashions, Inc. v. Braunheim
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The petitioner moves to compel arbitration of a dispute between the parties. Both parties admit that the agreement between the associations (of which petitioner and respondent are respectively members) requires arbitration of disputes. However, the respondent elected to institute an action against the petitioner in the Municipal Court. The suit was commenced on December 3, 1956. The petitioner claims that it was unaware of the existence of the arbitration agreement until some time in October, 1957. In the interim it served an answer and a demand for a bill of particulars, and, on or about…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Matter of Haupt v. RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- In Re the Estate of StoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Klein Coat Corp. v. PeretzNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- In re the Arbitration between Eimco Corp. & Deering, Milliken & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between New York Central Railroad & Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1961
- Royaloy, Inc. v. General Moving & Storage, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959