Krauss Et Ux. v. Potts
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Tillman County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by David Krauss and wife against James M. Potts and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The plaintiffs in error, as plaintiffs, sued the defendants’ to have a certain deed, absolute in' form, executed and delivered by them to one Geo. J. Hetzel, together with a contract of defeasance, executed at the same time, to secure a debt of $1.800 declared a mortgage, and that they be permitted to redeem against the defendant James M. Potts, the grantee of Eva M. Hetzel (the grantee of said Geo. J. Hetzel), and the Central Investment Company, mortgagee of said Hetzel, and Mary .K. Hammond, its as signee, and for rents and' other equitable relief. The defendant Potts, 'by way of answer,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Wagg v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
- Balduff Et Ux. v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Weiseham v. HockerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Whelan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Mills v. ReneauSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Williams v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Exchange Trust Co. v. GodfreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Krauss Et US. v. PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.