Legal Opinion

Balduff Et Ux. v. Griswold

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kay County; before • B. T. Hainer, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The defendant in error, On an F. Griswold, plaintiff in tli)e court below, brought this action to compel the defendants, Fred Balduff and wife,. to convey to him certain real estate in Kay county, Oklahoma, and more particularly described as lot 4, in block 49, in the towmsite of Hartman, now a part of Ponca City. The petition contained averments- to- the effect that Griswold purchased the lot from Barnes- & Dalto-n under an oral agreement that they would convey to him, by warranty deed, when he should pay the purchase money, and that he went into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carr v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Stoddard v. . WhitingNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  3. Moore v. WadeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Hassam v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  5. Farmer v. GroseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Coursey v. FairchildSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Gillett v. RomigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  4. Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API