Weiseham v. Hocker
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before Henry W. Scott, District Judge. Action by George W. Weiseham against Walter E. Hocker and James W. Hocker for specific performance of a contract for the conveyance of real estate. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of tbe court by
TaiisNex, J.:
On December 1, 1891, tbe defendants in error, W. E. Hocker, as principal, and James W. Hocker, as surety, executed and delivered to James Lappin an instrument in tbe form of a title bond, conditioned for tlie conveyance of lots 7 and 8, block 55, and lot 16, block 54, in tbe town of Lexington, provided that said Lappin should on or before the 1st day of May, 1892, pay tbe said TV E. Hocker tbe sum of $747.21. This instrument was, on March 28, 1892, assigned by Lappin to tbe plaintiff! in error, who brings this action for specific performance. Defendants…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Russell v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Hughes v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Teal v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Brick v. BrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Voris v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Worley, Receiver v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Taylor v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Williams v. PurcellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Shull v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.