Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 30, 1898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from the District Court of Kingfisher County/ before Jno. L. McAtee, District Judge. Action by Reuben Marshall against Louisa Marshall. Demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burwell, J.:

This is an action brought by Reuben Marshall in the district court of Kingfisher county, under section 588 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Statutes of Oklahoma of 1893, against Louisa Marshall, to reverse, vacate, and set aside a certain judgment rendered in said court on the 3rd day of October, 1895, for the sum of $1,900 and costs, and for a new trial, on the ground of fraud practiced by said Louisa Marshall in obtaining such judgment, and for unavoidable casualty or misfortune preventing the plaintiff in this action from prosecuting his appeal.

Reuben…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wagner v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Poff v. LockridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Gavin v. HeathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Lindsey v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API