Legal Opinion
Christopher R. v. Commissioner of Mental Retardation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 4, 2006No. SC 17318PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The defendant, the commissioner of mental retardation, appeals from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the appeal of the minor plaintiff, Christopher R., 1 brought through his father, James R., from the defendant’s decision concluding that the plaintiff is not eligible for services from the department of mental retardation (department) on the ground that the level of his intellectual functioning does not meet the definition of mental retardation as set forth in General Statutes (Rev. to 2003) § 1-lg. 2 The defendant contends that the trial court improperly concluded…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- MacDermid, Inc. v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- City of Hartford v. Hartford Municipal Employees Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Vincent v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Lorthe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Department of Public Safety v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.