Legal Opinion
Dinan v. Marchand
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 22, 2006No. SC 17536PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The plaintiff, Althea S. Dinan., appeals, following our grant of certification, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant, Donat C. Marchand, administrator of the estate of Albert A. Garofalo (testator). Dinan v. Marchand, 91 Conn. App. 492, 881 A.2d 503 (2005). The plaintiff had claimed that the will and codicil of her husband, the testator, improperly had been admitted to probate because the testator was under the undue influence 1 of his daughter, Anne Patten, when, in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. ClementeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hayes v. CamelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.