Legal Opinion

United States v. Farrington

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 19, 1964No. 17,526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*615Opinion of the Court

Kilday, Judge:

Appellant was tried by general court-martial, convened at Frankfurt/Main, Germany, charged with intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. He pleaded not guilty but was found guilty as charged. The court-martial sentenced him to a dishonorable discharge, total forfeitures, reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, and confinement at hard labor for a period of three years.

The convening authority approved the sentence and a board of review in the office of The Judge Advocate General…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruno v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. ChaddUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. AllinderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ForbesNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004
  2. United States v. SuttonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. SuttlesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. RineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. United States v. FlinchbaughU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API