Legal Opinion

Bruno v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 4, 1939No. 300PublishedCited by 402 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

In affirming the conviction of Jerry Bruno, who, with eighty-seven others, was convicted of a conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws, the Cireüit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dealt with an important question in the administration of federal criminal justice in such a way as to lead us to grant certiorari.

Some of Bruno’s co-defendants took the witness-stand. He did not. The trial court gave the following instructions to the jury regarding the attitude to be observed by them towards the accused as a witness:

“It is the privilege of a defendant to testify as a witness if, and only…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. United States v. BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

3Cited by402 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

397 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API