Legal Opinion

United States v. Suttles

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided January 17, 1979No. ACM S24643PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ARROWOOD, Judge:

The accused pleaded guilty to two specifications of larceny and one specification of uttering a worthless check with intent to deceive, in violation of Articles 121 and 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 923a.

During the presentencing portion of the trial, trial counsel placed in evidence performance reports and three letters of reprimand pertaining to the accused. Defense counsel made an unsworn statement on behalf of the accused and presented a stipulation of fact showing that his client had repaid a portion of the bad check.

When the military…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GravesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. ClayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  5. United States v. RogersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LewisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  2. United States v. JorkaskyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  3. United States v. KingU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. ManselU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. CollinsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API