Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Shah v. Harris

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 2001No. 82A01-0103-CV-111PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Dr. Kirit C. Shah ("Dr. Shah") appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for summary judgment. Dr. Shah raises the following issue: whether the trial court erred when it found a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Stan and Nancy Harris ("Harrises") filed their complaint within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. We agree that there remain no genuine issues of material facts regarding the statute of limitations. However, we believe that the Harrises timely filed their complaint and accordingly, we affirm the trial court's denial of Dr.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Jacobs v. ManhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Houser v. KaufmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Langman v. MilosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Rogers v. MendelIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API