Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Mendel
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided November 16, 2001No. 82A04-0103-CV-84PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATHIAS, Judge.
Dr. L. Ralph Rogers ("Dr. Rogers") appeals the trial court's order denying his motion for summary judgment. Dr. Rogers raises the following issue: whether the trial court erred when it found a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Ann Mendel and Linus Mendel ("Men-dels") filed their complaint within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. We agree with Dr. Rogers and accordingly, we reverse the trial court's denial of Dr. Rogers' summary judgment motion and remand with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of Dr. Rogers. 1 We hand this case…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martin v. RicheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Shah v. HarrisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Jacobs v. ManhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Langman v. MilosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Booth v. WileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.