Legal Opinion

Langman v. Milos

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2002No. 64A03-0109-CV-312PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHIAS, Judge.

Lawrence and Janice Langman ("the Langmans") appeal the Porter Superior Court's order granting the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Drs. Peter Milos, D.P.M. and Dennis W. Smith, D.P.M. ("the Defendants"). 1 The one dis-positive issue in the Langmans' appeal is: Whether the trial court erred when it found that there were no genuine issues of material fact regarding whether the Lang-mans filed their complaint within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. 2

We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

The facts most favorable to the trial court's judgment reveal that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Boggs v. Tri-State Radiology, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Van Dusen v. StottsIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Conard v. WaughIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garneau v. BushIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Herron v. AnigboIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Crowe, Chizek, & Co. v. Oil Technology, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. International Union of Police Associations, Local No. 133 v. RalstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. O'Connell v. Town of Schererville of Lake CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API