Plemmer v. Matthewson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Plaintiffs allege — and have contended both in the lower court and on appeal — that the Ordinance is invalid because the board of commissioners did not comply with the annexation procedures specified in N. C. Gen. Stats., Ch. 160, Art. 36, Part 1. Plaintiffs also alleged in their complaint that the enactment of the Ordinance violated the equal protection clauses of the North Carolina and United States Constitutions. The latter contention does not appear to have been made in the court below, and it is not made in the brief filed in this Court. It is, therefore, deemed abandoned.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. Guilford County Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- McIntyre v. ClarksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re Annexation Ordinances Nos. 866-870, Etc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Lutterloh v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Bland v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Booker v. Duke Medical CenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- White v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Maready v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.