Legal Opinion

McIntyre v. Clarkson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1961No. 239PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoobe, J.

In this Court defendants demur ore tenus to plaintiff’s complaint on the grounds that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and does not show that the plaintiff has sufficient legal interest to maintain the action.

Defendants contend that a resident, citizen and taxpayer, as such, does not have sufficient interest in the controversy to maintain an action, for himself and on behalf of others similarly situated, to- challenge the constitutionality of a statute providing for the appointment of justices of the peace for the county in which he resides and for payment…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Yarborough v. North Carolina Park CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Carolina-Virginia Coastal Highway v. Coastal Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  5. Glenn v. . Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Adams v. North Carolina Department of Natural & Economic ResourcesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Williams v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of NCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. Martin v. North Carolina Housing CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API