Legal Opinion

State Highway Department v. Hewitt Contracting Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 6, 1966No. 23225PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Justice.

1. All formal prayers contained in the petition are for the recovery of money judgments and no allusion is made in any of these prayers to any form of equitable relief. However, as recited in the foregoing statement of facts in the fifth count of the petition there is an allegation: “a mutual mistake of fact existed with reference to said contract and accordingly prays that said contract be rescinded. . .” Treating this allegation as a prayer for rescission of the contract between the parties, we consider the averments of the petition to decide whether the case made by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. State Highway Department v. Wright Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Hunt v. Hardwick & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  4. Smith v. Estey Organ Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Hairalson v. CarsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jahncke Service, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Department of Transportation v. Claussen Paving Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Woodall v. BeauchampCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Griggs v. DodsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
  5. State Highway Department v. Hewitt Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API