Hunt v. Hardwick & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Evidence. Fraud. Partnership. Contracts. Before Judge Fain. Whitfield Superior Court. April Term, 1881. . Reported in the decision.
1Opinion of the Court
Speer, Justice.
Defendants in error brought their suit against plaintiff in error upon a promissory note for the sum of seven hundred dollars, dated on nth December, 1875, and due 1st October, 1876, with certain credits thereon, said note payable to H. A. Lowry or bearer.
*101To the suit defendant below pleaded that the note is now and ever has been the property of the payee, H. A. Lowry. That it was given for a one-half interest in a stock of drugs, medicines, etc., belonging to the defendant, and Lowry, the payee of the note, who had been doing business under the name of Hunt & Lowry. That on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Cozart v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875
3Cited by27 opinions
- German American Mutual Life Ass'n v. FarleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Gibson v. AlfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Bean v. BickleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Couch v. CraneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.