Legal Opinion

Hairalson v. Carson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Smith. Telfair superior court. October term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtLumpkin, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, W. H. Hairalson, brought a petition against J. R. N. Carson alleging, in substance, the following: Hairalson purchased from Carson certain sawmill machinery,-and gave for the same a negotiable promissory note, due on the 1st day of December, 1899. The instrument embracing the note also contained a mortgage on the property purchased. The defendant fraudulently represented to the plaintiff at the time of the sale that the machinery was in good condition, in first-class order, and would do good work; whereas it was very inferior in character, badly worn, “almost wholly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Peek v. WrightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Bennett v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Steed v. SavageSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Russell v. Industrial Transp. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Clarke v. East Atlanta Land Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Christopher v. WhitmireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Sailors v. WoelfleTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API