Department of Transportation v. Claussen Paving Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
After entry of judgment denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the Department of Transportation (DOT) appealed from judgment entered on the jury’s verdict against DOT. No appeal had been taken within thirty days from entry of judgment against DOT on the jury’s verdict. Neither did DOT file a motion for new trial. DOT’s appeal is Case No. 36691.
In the cross appeal, Case No. 36692, Claussen Paving Company (Claussen) appeals the denial of its motion to dismiss DOT’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The appeal and cross appeal were filed in the Court of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ace Parts & Distributors, Inc. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- State Highway Department v. Hewitt Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- State Highway Department v. Hewitt Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Bass v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Interstate Contracting Corp. v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- ALDWORTH CO., INC. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
- Brookhaven Landscape & Grading Co., Inc. v. J. F. Barton Contracting Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Professional Consulting Services of Georgia, Inc. v. IbrahimCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- Brookhaven Landscape & Grading Co., Inc. v. J. F. Barton Contracting Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.