Legal Opinion
State Highway Department v. Wright Contracting Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 11, 1963No. 39894PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
It must first be determined whether or not the items claimed by the plaintiff in count 3 constituted “extra work” as defined by § 1.29 of the State Standard Specifications, in accordance with which the contractor agreed to perform the work under the contract. “Extra work” is defined as “work or material, the performance or furnishing of which is found necessary for proper completion of the improvement and which in principle is an obligation of the contractor, but which is not covered by any item in the bid schedule in the Proposal and for which no means of payment, direct…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McDaniel v. Mallary Bros. Machinery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Monk v. McDanielSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Robinson v. WellerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Anderson, Clayton & Co. v. ManghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Information Systems and Networks Corp. v. The City of Atlanta, Herbert L. McCallCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. S & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Georgia Department of Labor v. Rtt Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Brookhaven Landscape & Grading Co., Inc. v. J. F. Barton Contracting Company and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Department of Transportation v. Dalton Paving & Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.