Legal Opinion
ILLINOIS NAT'L INSURANCE CO. v. Palmer
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 28, 1983No. 82-829PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE ROMITI
delivered the opinion of the court:
The sole issue in this case is whether before an insured can recover under the hit-and-run provision of the uninsured motorist cover-' age provided an automobile liability policies he or his vehicle must be struck by the whole hit-and-run vehicle rather than by an integral part of that vehicle. The trial court found no coverage where the insured’s vehicle was struck by a lug nut flying off of the hit-and-run vehicle. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Plaintiff, Illinois National Insurance Company, filed the instant case…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Allied Fidelity Ins. Co. v. LambIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- In re the Arbitration between SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Latham v. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Barfield v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Milam v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. LeJeuneIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Hill v. Citizens Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- Oanh Thi Pham v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NormanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.