Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Ramsey
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 14, 1932No. 8690PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. The judgment upon which error was assigned was in effect the grant of an application for a receiver, which may be reviewed by a fast bill of exceptions. Civil Code, § 6153. See Jones v. Warnock, 67 Ga. 484. The case differs on its facts from Akins v. Mull, 150 Ga. 459 (104 S. E. 209), in which there was no hearing upon the merits of the case.
2. “In all suits for divorce, the party applying shall render a schedule, on oath, of the property owned or possessed by the parties at the time of the application — or at the time of the separation, if the parties have separated, — distinguishing the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Melvin v. MelvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Cooleewahee Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Akins v. MullSupreme Court of Georgia · 1920
- Coe Manufacturing Co. v. Dublin & Laurens BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Edwards v. United Food Brokers Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Ferrell v. WightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Kinney v. CrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Brannen v. BrannenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.