Legal Opinion

Jones v. Warnock

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 15, 1881PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Practice in ■ Supreme Court. Administrators and Executors. Title. Vendor and Purchaser. United States Courts. Comity. Before Judge SNEAD. Burke Superior Court. November Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

1. A motion was made to dismiss this writ of error because it could not be brought here on a fast bill of excep*485tions. Even if it could not, it would not be dismissed, but ordered entered on the docket for next term, it being-a case, even in the view taken of it by defendant’s counsel, which could be brought to this court in- the ordinary way. 55 Ga., 350.

But it may be brought to this court as a fast bill of exceptions and tried at this term. It appears that a restraining order had been granted by the chancellor with leave to the defendant to move to set it aside on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. M. Ferst & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Colbert v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Dent v. SummerlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  4. Hemphill v. Ruckersville BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Grizzel v. GrizzelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. Smith v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Ferrell v. WightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Kinney v. CrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Keen v. McAfeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API