Brannen v. Brannen
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hawkins, Justice.
1. The discretion of the trial judge in allowing or disallowing temporary alimony pending an action for divorce will not be controlled unless that discretion is shown to have been flagrantly abused. Code, § 30-205; Smith v. Smith, 125 Ga. 384 (53 S. E. 958); Aiken v. Aiken, 131 Ga. 578 (62 S. E. 820); Helton v. Helton, 146 Ga. 48 (90 S. E. 381); Gaskin v. Gaskin, 150 Ga. 756 (105 S. E. 369); Brown v. Brown, 159 Ga. 323 (125 S. E. 713); Cook v. Cook, 197 Ga. 703 (30 S. E. 2d, 479); Moss v. Moss, 200 Ga. 8, 12 (36 S. E. 2d, 431); Childs v. Childs, 203 Ga. 9 (45 S. E. 2d, 418);…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Willingham v. WillinghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Lawrence v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Lloyd v. LloydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Lybrand v. LybrandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brock v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
- Frankel v. FrankelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Golden v. GoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Harbuck v. HarbuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.