Fisher v. Western Fuse & Explosives Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll alone. The only question for determination concerns the ruling of the court below overruling a general demurrer to the amended complaint.
The action was brought to recover damages for the destruction of plaintiff’s dwelling-house, and the gravamen of the charge is contained in the following allegations: “That on the said nineteenth day of July, 1898, defendant carelessly, negligently, deceitfully, secretively, improvidently, and unsafely maintained a powder magazine, which was improperly constructed, containing not less than five thousand…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Laflin & Rand Powder Co. v. TearneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
- Kinney v. Koopman & GerdesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.California Supreme Court · 1945
- County of San Diego v. CarlstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Miller v. CooksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hamilton v. San Francisco, Napa & Calistoga RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- South v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.