Hamilton v. San Francisco, Napa & Calistoga Railway
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon an order sustaining without leave to amend a general demurrer to the second amended complaint for damages for the alleged negligence of the defendants as joint tort-feasors which resulted in the death of the plaintiff’s wife. The complaint was in two counts. On January 7, 1918, at about 3 o’clock in the afternoon, Mrs. Hamilton was a passenger for hire in an automobile operated by the defendant Petit, doing business and sued herein as California Taxi Service. In taking her to her destination the machine was driven along a driveway which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Smith v. ButtnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Schaake v. Eagle Automatic Can Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Bergen v. Tulare County Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kuchcinski v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Webb v. Union Pac. R.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952