Miller v. Cookson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAZLETT, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff sued for $10,275 in damages on account of personal injuries suffered by him, resulting from the explosion of an electrical exploder. He alleges that his injuries occurred in the course of his employment by defendant Mrs. Virginia L. Cookson, as a ranch hand on her ranch.
At the close of plaintiff’s case in chief, defendants moved for a nonsuit, contending that plaintiff had failed to make out a prima facie ease, and that no neglect was shown which would attach any liability to either defendant. The court made its order granting the motion on the ground that the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Stephens v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Means v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Genger v. AlbersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Hallman v. RichardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Moffatt v. Buffums' Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1937