Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bratnober

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1936No. 26153. En BancPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Thisaction is for personal injuries growing out of a collision between the disabled automobile of respondent and the Chrysler coupe of appellant. The case was tried to the court and a jury. Appropriate motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence were timely made by appellant, and over his objections the cause was submitted to the jury. A verdict was returned in favor of respondent for $3,500, upon which judgment was entered. Motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial were likewise timely, but unsuccessfully, made. This appeal results.

The collision occurred on a graveled road…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Chapin v. StickelWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Frowd v. MarchbankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Thomas v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Everest v. RieckenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Erickson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rieger v. KirklandWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Leer v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API