Smith v. Bratnober
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— Thisaction is for personal injuries growing out of a collision between the disabled automobile of respondent and the Chrysler coupe of appellant. The case was tried to the court and a jury. Appropriate motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence were timely made by appellant, and over his objections the cause was submitted to the jury. A verdict was returned in favor of respondent for $3,500, upon which judgment was entered. Motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial were likewise timely, but unsuccessfully, made. This appeal results.
The collision occurred on a graveled road…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Hartley v. LasaterWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Chapin v. StickelWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Frowd v. MarchbankWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- Thomas v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Everest v. RieckenWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Erickson v. BarnesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Rieger v. KirklandWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Leer v. CohenWashington Supreme Court · 1941