Legal Opinion

Everest v. Riecken

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1948No. 30472PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

On the first trial of this case, it was dismissed on a motion for a directed verdict. The judgment of dis missal was reversed by this court, and the case was remanded to the superior court with instructions to grant a new trial. Everest v. Riecken, 26 Wn. (2d) 542, 174 P. (2d) 762. At that time the father and mother of Jack Everest, and his father as his guardian ad litem, were the plaintiffs (and appellants). Subsequently, Jack Everest became of age and was substituted as the sole plaintiff. On the second trial, the jury found for the defendants, and from a judgment of dismissal this appeal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Leftridge v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bagwill v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. McLeod v. Charleston LaundryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chapin v. StickelWashington Supreme Court · 1933

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Young v. Caravan CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bauman v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mondor v. RhoadesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Coins v. Washington Motor Coach Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Patterson v. KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API