Legal Opinion

McReavy v. Eshelman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1892No. 520PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

Respondent moves to dismiss for want of an assignment of errors. Code Proc. § 1428, is the only place where an assignment of errors is mentioned in our statutes as they now exist. We think, inasmuch as the technical writ of error is now obsolete in our practice, so is the technical assignment of errors. All causes are removed to this court on appeal, and the section of the statute above cited merely recognizes the necessity of some orderly statement of grievances by the appealing party for the consideration of this court. It is a regulation…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Ware, Murphy & Co. v. Morgan & DuncanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Newman v. SylvesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Rhode Island Mortgage & Trust Co. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Schmitz v. KleeWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Smith v. Orr Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API