Legal Opinion

Little Rock Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Kavanaugh

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 23, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division; G. W. Hendricks, Judge; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. Appellants were plaintiffs below, and alleged in their complaint, 'Substantially, the following facts. The plaintiffs are corporations, organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas, and are engaged in the manufacture and sale of furniture.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Pulaski Circuit Court, Third Division; G. W. Hendricks, Judge; STATEMENT BY THE COURT. Appellants were plaintiffs below, and alleged in their complaint, 'Substantially, the following facts. The plaintiffs are corporations, organized under the laws of the State of Arkansas, and are engaged in the manufacture and sale of furniture. At a mass meeting of the citizens of Little Rock, held in the summer of 1910, to arrange plans for entertaining the Confederate Reunion in May, 1911, the defendants were selected as an executive committee, with W. M. Kavanaugh as chairman, to control the…

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellants say the evidence is practically undisputed, and that a verdict should have been directed in their favor.' That this is true because appellees were members of a voluntary association, and acted within the scope of their authority in making the contract sued on, and that they are therefore within the rule of law that, “Each member of an association is liable for the debts thereof, incurred during his period of membership, and which have been necessarily contracted for the purposes of carrying out the objects for which the association was formed.”…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. TiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  2. Lawler v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  3. Davison v. HoldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1887
  4. Heath v. GoslinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  5. Bennett v. LathropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984
  2. Pinsky v. Pikesville Recreation CouncilCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  3. Victor v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Sears Roebuck & Co. v. WolfAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  5. Heywood-Wakefield Co. v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API