Legal Opinion

Dung v. . Parker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1873PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The contract proved, on the part of the plaintiff, was a parol contract by the defendant assuming to act as agent for the College of Physicians and Surgeons, for the leasing to the plaintiff, for the term of two years, of a store to be occupied as a drug store.

If the defendant had possessed full authority to lease the premises, or if the contract had been made directly with the trustees of the corporation, it would have been without legal force or validity.

The statute declares that a contract for the leasing of lands for a longer period than one year, unless the contract or some note or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cagger v. . LansingNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Palmer v. StephensCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. Meech v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  4. Gallager v. BrunelNew York Supreme Court · 1826

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Rice v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Holm v. C.M.P. Sheet Metal, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Canell v. Arcola Housing Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API