Legal Opinion

Newman v. Sylvester

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

The appellee sued the appellants and four others in the Superior Court. -It is not necessary to notice the proceedings against the others, as final judgment has been rendered for them and no cross errors have been assigned by the appellee.

The appellants demurred to the complaint. The demurrer was overruled. They then filed an answer, to which a demurrer was sustained, and final judgment was rendered against them for $359.04. They appealed to the general term, where the judgment was affirmed. Proper exceptions were taken and errors assigned, and the questions arising on the pleadings are…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Hodgson v. DexterSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  3. Hall v. . LauderdaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Ballou v. TalbotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
  5. Long v. ColburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Strosser v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Lutz v. Van Heynigen Brokerage Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Summers v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. City of Madison v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Citizens' Gas & Mining Co. v. Town of ElwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API