Legal Opinion

McConnell v. Redd

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1927No. Docket No. 5784PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action in claim and delivery. The complaint in substance alleges ownership in plaintiff of a certain ice-machine, cooler, and equipment, of the value of $400; wrongful possession and detention by defendant, and a demand for delivery. The prayer is for possession of the property or in case delivery cannot be had for its value together with damages. The answer denies ownership in plaintiff; alleges the value of the property to be $875; admits possession; alleges ownership in defendant- and denies wrongful detention.

Briefly stated, the facts show that plaintiff was engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hegler v. EddyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Silverstin v. Kohler & ChaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Bice v. Harold L. Arnold, IncorporatedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Weber Showcase & Fixture Co. v. WaughDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930
  3. Martin v. HollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Jordan v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Hannin v. FisherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API