Hegler v. Eddy
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Twelfth Judicial District, San Francisco. Judgment was rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court :
This is an action in the nature of an action of replevin, for the recovery of the possession of certain household furniture. The complaint is in the usual form, alleging the ownership and riuht or possession of the plaintiff, a demand that the defendant deliver the possession of the property, the refusal of the defendant so to do, and her unlawful withholding of the possession thereof, to the plaintiff’s damage, etc. The answer denies each of those allegations, except the withholding of the property, but does not set up any new matter.
*598The contract under which the parties claim,…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Parke & Lacy Co. v. White River Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Liver v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Palmer v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Kerns v. McKeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.