Legal Opinion

Schell v. Gamble

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1908No. S.F. No. 4716PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The action was instituted September 15, 1902, by a judgment creditor of defendant A. W. Gamble, to subject certain real property in Santa Cruz and Contra Costa counties, standing of record in the name of defendant W. H. Gamble, son of defendant A. W. Gamble, to execution upon the judgment of plaintiff, upon the ground as to the Santa Cruz property, that a conveyance thereof by the father to the son, made July 20, 1893, was made with intent to defraud certain designated creditors and is void, and upon the ground as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bush & Mallett Co. v. HelbingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People ex rel. State Board of Harbor Commissioners v. Steamer AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  2. Franck v. MoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Southwick v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Denehy v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Barr v. RoderickDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API