Legal Opinion

Southwick v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1923No. Civ. No. 4027PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

This is an action by the plaintiff as a creditor of Thomas W. Moore, deceased, to set aside a deed from said decedent to his wife, Mary Theresa Moore, on the ground that the deed was given to defraud creditors. By this proceeding it was sought to claim the property conveyed and have it declared that of the estate of Thomas W. Moore, and as such applied to the satisfaction of the plaintiff’s claim, which had been allowed and approved before the filing of the action, in the sum of $3,457.09. The deed in question was executed on the twenty-fourth day of March, 1898, and purported to convey a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Judson v. LyfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Murphy v. MulgrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Phillips v. HagartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Washburn v. HuntingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ross v. WellmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dixon Lumber Co. v. PeacockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Allee v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Alpha Hardware & Supply Co. v. Ruby Mines Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Hanscome-James-Winship v. AingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Sudbrock v. KroenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API