Dickensheets v. Kaufman
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Pulaski Common Pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, C. J.
— This was a suit by tbe appellees against tbe appellants upon an account and note. There was also *252an attachment of the real estate of the appellant Dichensheets. Judgment went against the appellant Silvers, by default, and the record presents no question of which he can avail himself in this court.
Dichenslieets made an unsuccessful motion to quash the attachment, because the return thereto, though it showed that the officer did not find any personal property, did not disclose that search had been made for personal property. There was nothing in the motion, even if it were granted that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tomlinson v. CollettIndiana Supreme Court · 1834
- Springer v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1822
3Cited by18 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. SmockIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. BordenIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Tittle v. Covington Community Consolidated Schools of FountainIndiana Supreme Court · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.