Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago R. W. Co. v. Treadway

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1895No. 16,815PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Prom the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee brought this action against appellants, the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago R. W. Co., commonly called the “Monon,” and the Toledo, St. Louis and Kansas City R. R. Co., commonly called the “Clover Leaf,” to recover damages for injuries *691alleged to have been received by her at a depot used and maintained by appellants.

Appellants each filed separate demurrers to the complaint, for the reason that the same did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which demurrers were overruled by the court, and exceptions were reserved.. The “Monon” filed an answer in two…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Davis v. Central Congregational Society of Jamaica PlainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. VandenbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Clayton v. Enterprise Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API