Doerr, Admr. v. Hibben, Hollweg Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtRemy, J.
On January 2, 1922, appellant’s decedent, John W. Coneys, and Elizabeth Sutton, by written instrument, formed a general partnership to conduct a mercantile business, the firm name to be The Sutton Shop. By the terms of the agreement, Sutton was to have charge of the business and give the same all of her time; Coneys was to advance the money to start the business, and was to supply additional capital if necessary; profits and losses to be shared equally.
On March 20, 1922, Coneys executed and delivered to appellee his written contract of guaranty, by which he guaranteed to appellee the payment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chester v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Jungk v. HolbrookUtah Supreme Court · 1897
- Leavitt v. PeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1819
- Fishel v. PinckardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Beach v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Park 100 Investors, Inc. v. KartesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995