Legal Opinion

Adams v. Godwin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1961No. 521PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PeR Cueiam.

The defendant assigns as error the admission of certain evidence relating to insurance. This evidence was brought out in a vigorous cross-examination of the plaintiff by defendant’s counsel. Moreover, later on, during the further cross-examination of this same witness, substantially the same information was brought out twice more and no obj ection or exception was made or entered thereto.

We have repeatedly held that an exception is waived when other evidence of the same import is admitted without objection. Spears v. Randolph, 241 N.C. 659, 86 S.E. 2d 263; Wilson v. Finance Co.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Anderson v. ConterioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Spears v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. White v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Garee v. McDonellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Hutton v. LowrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  5. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API