State v. Wells
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant assigns error to the court’s admission, over his repeated objections, of Trooper Parks’ opinion as to where the collision between the two cars occurred. This assignment of error is sustained.
Our State Supreme Court has held in several cases that while it is competent for an investigating officer to testify as to the condition and position of the vehicles and other physical facts observed by him at the scene of an accident, his testimony as to his conclusions from those facts is incompetent. See Farrow v. Baugham, 266 N.C. 739, 147 S.E. 2d 167 (1966); McGinnis v.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Delaware Republican State Committee v. RedfearnSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. Van LandinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. HewittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. SmithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MareadyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Thompson v. Lenoir Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Blackwell v. HatleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Joines v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.